Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?

This message: [ Message body ] [ Respond ] [ More options ]
Related messages: [ Next message ] [ Previous message ] [ In reply to ] [ Next in thread ] [ Replies ]

From: James Kass via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 20:16:21 -0800

It will probably be the ASCII apostrophe. The stated intent favors
the apostrophe over diacritics or special characters to ensure that
the language can be input to computers with standard keyboards.
Received on Mon Jan 15 2018 - 22:16:43 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Pravin Jain via Unicode: "Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?"
Previous message: Doug Ewell via Unicode: "Re: Non-RGI sequences are not emoji? (was: Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10))"
In reply to: Eric Muller via Unicode: "0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?"
Next in thread: Pravin Jain via Unicode: "Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?"
Reply: Pravin Jain via Unicode: "Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?"
Reply: Richard Wordingham via Unicode: "Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?"
Reply: Christoph Päper via Unicode: "Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jan 15 2018 - 22:16:43 CST