Unicode Mail List Archive by date

Tuesday, 1 October
- Re: COMBINING OVER MARK? Khaled Hosny
- Re: COMBINING OVER MARK? FrÃ©dÃ©ric Grosshans
- Re: COMBINING OVER MARK? Steffen
- Re: COMBINING OVER MARK? Philippe Verdy
- Re: COMBINING OVER MARK? FrÃ©dÃ©ric Grosshans
- Re: COMBINING OVER MARK? Richard Wordingham
- Re: COMBINING OVER MARK? Leo Broukhis
- Re: COMBINING OVER MARK? Leo Broukhis
- Re: COMBINING OVER MARK? Leo Broukhis
- Re: COMBINING OVER MARK? Asmus Freytag
- Re: COMBINING OVER MARK? Leo Broukhis
- Re: COMBINING OVER MARK? Khaled Hosny
- Re: COMBINING OVER MARK? Denis Jacquerye
- Re: COMBINING OVER MARK? Leo Broukhis
- Re: COMBINING OVER MARK? Jean-FranÃ§ois Colson
- Re: COMBINING OVER MARK? Jean-François Colson
- Re: COMBINING OVER MARK? Leo Broukhis
- Re: COMBINING OVER MARK? Mark E. Shoulson
- Re: COMBINING OVER MARK? Leo Broukhis
Wednesday, 2 October
- Re: COMBINING OVER MARK? Martin J. DÃ¼rst
Thursday, 3 October
- Re: COMBINING OVER MARK? Jukka K. Korpela
Tuesday, 8 October
- Public Review Issues: Feedback on repertoire for ISO/IEC 10646:2014 (4th Edition) announcements_at_unicode.org
Thursday, 10 October
- [CSSWG][css-text-3] CSS3 Text Last Call Working Draft fantasai
Sunday, 13 October
- full-width Latin missing from confusables data Chris Weber
Monday, 14 October
- Re: full-width Latin missing from confusables data Mark Davis â˜•
- Translation glasses William_J_G Overington
- RE: full-width Latin missing from confusables data Michel Suignard
- IUC 37 - Only one week away Rick McGowan
Tuesday, 15 October
- Re: full-width Latin missing from confusables data Chris Weber
- Re: full-width Latin missing from confusables data Mark Davis â˜•
Friday, 18 October
- 6.3.0 Bidi implementation snag Loren Brichter
- RE: 6.3.0 Bidi implementation snag Whistler, Ken
- Re: 6.3.0 Bidi implementation snag Loren Brichter
Saturday, 19 October
- Armenian typography, letter t Julian Bradfield
- Definition of Logical Order Richard Wordingham
- Dotted Circle plus Combining Mark as Text Richard Wordingham
Sunday, 20 October
- Re: Dotted Circle plus Combining Mark as Text Jukka K. Korpela
- Re: Definition of Logical Order Richard Wordingham
- Re: Dotted Circle plus Combining Mark as Text Jukka K. Korpela
- Re: Dotted Circle plus Combining Mark as Text Philippe Verdy
- Re: Dotted Circle plus Combining Mark as Text Philippe Verdy
- Re: Dotted Circle plus Combining Mark as Text Richard Wordingham
- Re: Dotted Circle plus Combining Mark as Text Philippe Verdy
- Re: Dotted Circle plus Combining Mark as Text Richard Wordingham
- Re: Dotted Circle plus Combining Mark as Text Philippe Verdy
- Re: Dotted Circle plus Combining Mark as Text Asmus Freytag
- Re: Dotted Circle plus Combining Mark as Text Philippe Verdy
- Re: Dotted Circle plus Combining Mark as Text Asmus Freytag
- Re: Dotted Circle plus Combining Mark as Text Philippe Verdy
- Re: Dotted Circle plus Combining Mark as Text Andrew Cunningham
- Re: Dotted Circle plus Combining Mark as Text Philippe Verdy
- Re: Definition of Logical Order Richard Wordingham
- Re: Dotted Circle plus Combining Mark as Text Richard Wordingham
- Re: Dotted Circle plus Combining Mark as Text Richard Wordingham
- Re: Indic LLA sorting Anubhav Chattoraj
Monday, 21 October
- Re: Dotted Circle plus Combining Mark as Text Philippe Verdy
- Update xidmodifications.txt for Unicode 6.3? Simon Montagu
- Re: Dotted Circle plus Combining Mark as Text Richard Wordingham
- Re: Dotted Circle plus Combining Mark as Text Philippe Verdy
- Re: Dotted Circle plus Combining Mark as Text Richard Wordingham
Tuesday, 22 October
- Re: Dotted Circle plus Combining Mark as Text Philippe Verdy
- Fwd: IUC 37 - only a week away N. Ganesan
- Re: Dotted Circle plus Combining Mark as Text Otto Stolz
- ¥ instead of \ Jean-François Colson
- Re: Â¥ instead of \ Asmus Freytag
- Re: Â¥ instead of \ Jukka K. Korpela
Wednesday, 23 October
- Re: Â¥ instead of \ Denis Jacquerye
- Re: ¥ instead of \ Philippe Verdy
Thursday, 24 October
- RE: Â¥ instead of \ Koji Ishii
- Re: ¥ instead of \ Philippe Verdy
Friday, 25 October
- Re: Dotted Circle plus Combining Mark as Text Lorna Evans
- Re: Dotted Circle plus Combining Mark as Text Philippe Verdy
Saturday, 26 October
- RE: ¥ instead of \ Koji Ishii
- Re: Dotted Circle plus Combining Mark as Text Richard Wordingham
- Why isn't there a RIGHTWARDS BLACK ARROW? Sindre Sorhus
- Re: Why isn't there a RIGHTWARDS BLACK ARROW? Jukka K. Korpela
- Re: Why isn't there a RIGHTWARDS BLACK ARROW? Charlie Ruland â˜˜
- Re: Why isn't there a RIGHTWARDS BLACK ARROW? Clark S. Cox III
- Re: Why isn't there a RIGHTWARDS BLACK ARROW? Sindre Sorhus
- RE: Why isn't there a RIGHTWARDS BLACK ARROW? Michel Suignard
- Re: Why isn't there a RIGHTWARDS BLACK ARROW? Philippe Verdy
- Re: Dotted Circle plus Combining Mark as Text Philippe Verdy
Sunday, 27 October
- Re: Why isn't there a RIGHTWARDS BLACK ARROW? Sindre Sorhus
- Re: Why isn't there a RIGHTWARDS BLACK ARROW? Charlie Ruland â˜˜
Saturday, 26 October
- Re: Â¥ instead of \ Martin J. DÃ¼rst
Monday, 28 October
- Do you know a tool to decode "UTF-8 twice" JÃ¶rg Knappen
- Re: Do you know a tool to decode "UTF-8 twice" Steffen
- AW: Â¥ instead of \ Dreiheller, Albrecht
- Aw: Re: Do you know a tool to decode "UTF-8 twice" JÃ¶rg Knappen
- Re: Aw: Re: Do you know a tool to decode "UTF-8 twice" Steffen
- Re: Re: Do you know a tool to decode "UTF-8 twice" Buck Golemon
- Re: Aw: Re: Do you know a tool to decode "UTF-8 twice" Markus Scherer
- Re: Re: Do you know a tool to decode "UTF-8 twice" Rebecca Bettencourt
- Re: Re: Do you know a tool to decode "UTF-8 twice" Buck Golemon
- Proposed Updates for UTR #36 and UTS #39 now open for review announcements_at_unicode.org
- Terminology question re ASCII dzo_at_bisharat.net
Tuesday, 29 October
- Re: Terminology question re ASCII Mark Davis â˜•
- Fwd: Terminology question re ASCII Christopher Vance
- Re: Terminology question re ASCII Jukka K. Korpela
- Re: Terminology question re ASCII David Starner
- Re: Terminology question re ASCII Janusz S. Bien
- Re: Terminology question re ASCII Jukka K. Korpela
- Re: Aw: Re: Do you know a tool to decode "UTF-8 twice" Steffen
- Re: full-width Latin missing from confusables data Mark Davis â˜•
- Re: Terminology question re ASCII Philippe Verdy
- RE: Terminology question re ASCII Shawn Steele
- public review issue reminder Rick McGowan
- Aw: Re: Re: Do you know a tool to decode "UTF-8 twice" JÃ¶rg Knappen
- Re: Terminology question re ASCII Philippe Verdy
- Re: Re: Re: Do you know a tool to decode "UTF-8 twice" Philippe Verdy
- Re: Aw: Re: Re: Do you know a tool to decode "UTF-8 twice" Steffen
Wednesday, 30 October
- Re: Aw: Re: Re: Do you know a tool to decode "UTF-8 twice" FrÃ©dÃ©ric Grosshans
- Re: Aw: Re: Re: Do you know a tool to decode "UTF-8 twice" FrÃ©dÃ©ric Grosshans
- Aw: Re: Re: Re: Do you know a tool to decode "UTF-8 twice" JÃ¶rg Knappen
- Re: Aw: Re: Re: Re: Do you know a tool to decode "UTF-8 twice" FrÃ©dÃ©ric Grosshans
- Aw: Re: Re: Re: Re: Do you know a tool to decode "UTF-8 twice" JÃ¶rg Knappen
- Re: Aw: Re: Re: Re: Re: Do you know a tool to decode "UTF-8 twice" FrÃ©dÃ©ric Grosshans
- Re: Aw: Re: Re: Re: Re: Do you know a tool to decode "UTF-8 twice" Buck Golemon
- Re: Best practice of using regex on identify none-ASCII email address James Lin
- RE: Best practice of using regex on identify none-ASCII email address Shawn Steele
- Re: Best practice of using regex on identify none-ASCII email address James Lin
- RE: Best practice of using regex on identify none-ASCII email address Shawn Steele
- Re: Best practice of using regex on identify none-ASCII email address Philippe Verdy
- RE: Best practice of using regex on identify none-ASCII email address Shawn Steele
- Re: Best practice of using regex on identify none-ASCII email address Philippe Verdy
- RE: Best practice of using regex on identify none-ASCII email address Shawn Steele
Thursday, 31 October
- Re: Best practice of using regex on identify none-ASCII email address Philippe Verdy

Last message date: Thu Oct 31 2013 - 14:42:26 CDT
Archived on: Thu Oct 31 2013 - 14:42:28 CDT

127 messages sort by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Oct 31 2013 - 14:42:28 CDT